Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, philosophy homework help

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Need an answer from similar question? You have just landed to the most confidential, trustful essay writing service to order the paper from.
Just from $13/Page
Order Now

Length: Two Full Pages, Typed, Double-Spaced

Style: MLA Format (See guidelines in handbook)

Answer the two questions listed below to the best of your ability. Your
answers to the questions should be thorough yet precise, using examples
from the in-class discussions and the film to strengthen your
responses. The final grade on this assignment will be determined by your
ability to demonstrate a depth and understanding of the questions posed
and by your ability to communicate that through your writing.

Mechanics: In order to be considered for grading, your paper must be at least Two full pages, typed, double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font. You
do not need to include outside sources. A Works Cited page is not
needed. Good grammar, good spelling, and punctuation, while not
specifically used to determine your final grade, are to be assumed. Keep
this is mind: An unpolished work will not be an A paper.

Questions: The following questions are based on the philosophical questions raised by the movie Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.

  1. Using
    Plato’s The Allegory of the Cave as a starting point, discuss what
    information from the film that each character learned about life once
    they “walked into the light”. What was the point of the trip to Las
    Vegas? What was the real reason Raoul Duke wanted to go to Vegas? What
    was he searching for? Did they find ‘it’? For this answer, it would be
    best to think of Plato’s story as direct allegory meant to represent the
    trials and tribulations facing humanity and the ultimate struggle for
    knowledge. What knowledge about humanity does Duke learn and how does he
    come to terms with that revelation?
  2. Irish Empirical philosopher
    George Berkley was best known for his empiricist and idealist
    philosophy, which holds that everything save the spiritual exists only
    insofar as it is perceived by the senses (esse est percipi). What really
    exists in the film? Is the entire plot of the film a mere
    hallucination? Or can something that might not look or appear to exist
    come into existence through our perception of it? If our senses perceive
    it, does ‘it’ then exist? Use examples from the film while also
    acknowledging that somethings exist and continue to exist even if we are
    not currently perceiving them (art or abstract things for example).