Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, philosophy homework help

Length: Two Full Pages, Typed, Double-Spaced

Style: MLA Format (See guidelines in handbook)

Assignment:
Answer the two questions listed below to the best of your ability. Your
answers to the questions should be thorough yet precise, using examples
from the in-class discussions and the film to strengthen your
responses. The final grade on this assignment will be determined by your
ability to demonstrate a depth and understanding of the questions posed
and by your ability to communicate that through your writing.

Mechanics: In order to be considered for grading, your paper must be at least Two full pages, typed, double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font. You
do not need to include outside sources. A Works Cited page is not
needed. Good grammar, good spelling, and punctuation, while not
specifically used to determine your final grade, are to be assumed. Keep
this is mind: An unpolished work will not be an A paper.

Questions: The following questions are based on the philosophical questions raised by the movie Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.

1. Using
   Plato’s The Allegory of the Cave as a starting point, discuss what
   information from the film that each character learned about life once
   they “walked into the light”. What was the point of the trip to Las
   Vegas? What was the real reason Raoul Duke wanted to go to Vegas? What
   was he searching for? Did they find ‘it’? For this answer, it would be
   best to think of Plato’s story as direct allegory meant to represent the
   trials and tribulations facing humanity and the ultimate struggle for
   knowledge. What knowledge about humanity does Duke learn and how does he
   come to terms with that revelation?
2. Irish Empirical philosopher
   George Berkley was best known for his empiricist and idealist
   philosophy, which holds that everything save the spiritual exists only
   insofar as it is perceived by the senses (esse est percipi). What really
   exists in the film? Is the entire plot of the film a mere
   hallucination? Or can something that might not look or appear to exist
   come into existence through our perception of it? If our senses perceive
   it, does ‘it’ then exist? Use examples from the film while also
   acknowledging that somethings exist and continue to exist even if we are
   not currently perceiving them (art or abstract things for example).